I'm wondering if there is something about ITC procedure we do not know. If tomorrow is the deadline for summary motions, then how can a party submit an MSJ without knowing the claim construction? Which is what you have referenced and pointed out the very question listed above.

There seems to be a lot of wrestling regarding Acer, which otherwise IML'sO should've been addressed already. Letters and hearings specific to the daughter board production? TPL has Acer's supplier (or whomever) on record stating daughter board schematics are common practices when receiving said component. Strange to me.

Hopefully all of this good will we are accumulating with our patience and friendly tone with Acer will pay off with the court.