I think there is a good chance that some of the supposed late produced documents that are being referred to may be connected with respondents' multiple motions to Preclude and Strike Complainants' Infringement Claims Beyond the Scope of It's February 3, 2013 Contention Interrogatory Disclosures. Motions filed by at least Keyocera, LG, Huawei, and ZTE.

We are already accusing infringement on every 336 claim, so I suspect the additional infringement contentions probably have to do with discovery of more infringing microprocessors in some of these products.

If that is the case, then a ruling against us really does nothing with respect to the original infringement claims. However, a ruling in our favor would surely make things more difficult for respondents.

Opty