You have digressed from the orginal subject of what the SD motion is about to wanting to know why "entire" was added to the claims. And demanding an explanation from me, as if that is my job.

I told you why it was added. If you don't believe what I said, and you truly want to know why "entire" was added, I suggest you revist the USPTO reexams. There may even be a reasonably complete explanation in one of the Markman briefs as well. I know there is an explanation I read somewhere.

When you find what you need, please be sure to correct anything that I've said.

Opty