Because the supplemental opinion was late, it was not allowed. Could it be that it's material wasn't needed anyway for a rebuttal of the request for Summary Judgement, and that if it were not thrown out being late could give grounds to the infringers for a 'down the road' appeal of some sorts? I can see the courts opinion taking such things into consideration.

I still ain't skeered, but based on the sell off today, I'm trying to figure it out just like everyone else here.

Good luck to all!