Impressive work by Otteson. (Caveat - I haven't read the Respondent's ITC Markman hearing testimony)..

I am genuinely heartened by Otteson's presentation and interplay with Judge Gildea while discussing the 336 MMP. Otteson goes point-by-point refuting the Respondnent's position and illustrating the deception, incongruity, and twisted logic of their position again and again.

Referencing prior Markman hearings, (Judge Ward) wherever possible, and illustrating in precise detail how the Respondent's ideas are abject fallacy and their attempts to subvert the originality and creativity associated with the MMP was masterful. He brought his "A" game. Good lawyering !!

Given Otteson's strong defense of the '336, delving into minute detail at times, leaving no stone unturned, pointing out the repeated deceptions the other side is attempting to present as fact, it is quite evident there are clear differences and interpretations between the two parties. This leads me to believe Judge Gildea will allow the investigation to continue and proceed to trial, especially over basis of fact issues, denying the MSJ, assuming outside political influence is held to a minimum...Virt