Ease, I like the last part of your post better, you make it seem like we have a 50/50 chance of winning this.

The odds are in our favor, I do not care how knowledgeable your are with the integrated circuits. Your technical integrated circuit language will not be able to relate to 99% of the readers on agora, for all I know you could say it’s a monkey causing the ring to oscillate and we still would have no idea of how this stuff works.

We can only count on 17 Patent Revalidations based on the same arguments that you refer to as well as the infringers.

Otteson knows that what the arguments are and I can bet that they will win this for us because they are proven experts at what they do.

While you do your best to inform everyone on how this circuitry works, you are also creating a negativity and the idea that we may lose.

I still feel we have a 99% chance of winning this, because the ALJ has said that they reserve the right to reconsider any other documents if they feel they are pertinent to the case.

Its really not all that bad you know. I know Google is on TPL's rader after June 3rd.