UNITED STATES INTERNATIO
NAL TRADE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC
Before The Honorable E. James Gildea
Administrative Law Judge
In the Matter of
CERTAIN
WIRELESS
CONSUMER
ELECTRONICS
DEVICES
AND
COMPONENTS
THEREOF
Inv. No. 337-TA-853
RESPONDENTS' RESPONSE TO COMPLAINANTS’ MOTION
IN LIMINE
TO
EXCLUDE ANY TESTIMONY, ARGUMENT,
OR EVIDENCE RELATED TO
WRITTEN DESCRIPTION DEFENSE
(RESPONSE TO COMPLAINANTS’ MOTION
IN LIMINE
NO. 2)
Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.15, and th
e Ground Rules in this Investigation, and
Order No. 15 setting the procedural schedule,
Respondents Acer Inc. and Acer America
Corporation; Amazon.com, Inc.; Barnes & Noble,
Inc.; Garmin Ltd., Garmin
International, Inc.
and Garmin USA, Inc.; HTC Corporation & HTC Am
erica, Inc.; Huawei T
echnologies Co., Ltd.,
Huawei Device Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA Inc
., and Futurewei Technologies, Inc.; Kyocera
Corporation & Kyocera Communicati
ons, Inc.; LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A.,
Inc.; Nintendo Co., Ltd., and Nintendo of Amer
ica Inc.; Novatel Wireless, Inc.; Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. and Sams
ung Electronics America, Inc.; and ZTE Corporation & ZTE
(USA) Inc., (collectively, "Respondents") submit
this response to Complainants Technology
Properties Limited, LLC (“TPL”), Patriot Scientif
ic Corporation (“PTSC”)
, and Phoenix Digital
Systems (“PDS”) (collectively, “Complainants”), motion
in limine
to exclude testimony,
argument, and other evidence related to the va
lidity of U.S. Patent No. 5,809,336 (the “’336
Patent”) based on Respondents’ written descri
ption defense (Mot. Dkt. No. 853-052, hereinafter
"MIL No. 2").