That was a very good article thanks for sharing. I feel much better now. Regarding the Coaxial case

the ALJ determined that complainant's investments in approximately $27,000 in attorney fees for litigation involving the suit patent (and an additional $15,000 in attorneys fees accorded lesser weight) did not meet the domestic industry requirement - particularly in view of the fact that complainant had no established licensing program, the alleged "licensing industry" had executed only a single license in the patent in suit, and Complainant had not engaged in licensing offers or talks with any entities other than its single licensee. Notably, though, the ALJ characterized the issue as a "close call." The ITC affirmed this determination without opinion on July 12, 2010.

Surely, we have this one beat!!