Not intending to say one trumps the other.

Simply pointing out that 123Mark is pushing the doom disaster logic that says we lose the domestic industry issue because of one ALJ order that simply denied a pre-trial motion to allow reliance on PTSC & PDS financial info in addition to TPL's info.

If he wants to post ad nauseum about that issue and ratchet it up to a conclusion that all is lost, then the it's equally valid to say that the respondents have lost the infringement issue because the ALJ's denial of a pre-trial motion to dismiss the case through their summary judement motion.

It's especially comically ironic that the summary judgement denial order came AFTER 123Mark's cataclysmic domestic industry denial order.

Simply put, there was a 2 week trial allowed for both sides to state their cases and depending on who did that better and on whose side the facts lie and on how well the ALJ and the ITC are able to rule on such cases in the vacuum they should rule versus with the influences of politics and other outside forces will determine the case. His, or ease's, or yours or mine or anyone's pontification here on this board at this stage really doesn't impact or clarify what the process will reveal or how it will be decided.

There will be a ruling, and the process will continue whether we win at the ITC or whether we lose at the ITC.