We all objectively believe there is Infringment, even if we have difficulty proving that in Court.

We've had over 100 examples via Licenses that indicate that some level of MMP Infringment was / is likely rampant. Even our opposing litigants are saying they only don't infringe because of some alternative method that requires all kinds of subjective explainations by them to be believeable or at least arguable.

The issue has always been HOW MUCH IS THEIR INFRINGMENT WORTH, WOW MUCH WILL WE BE COMPENSATED FOR OUR LOST REVENUES DUE TO THEIR (WILLFUL ?) INFRINGMENT.

If the Settlement or Award numbers don't start coming in large, PTSC's stock can continue to languish for a long long time. TPL and the contingency Law Firm can be do quite well with smaller license numbers coming in over the next few years, they're private organizations with smaller revenue requirements, but PTSC's stock price will be gauged against traditional Public Company metrics and valuations, and with 400Million shares outstanding, we NEED large Settlement or Award numbers to generate investor demand and attractive price multipliers; especially with an eroding timeclock cap on our revenue potential.

Settlement numbers must begin to genuinely get LARGE. So ... if "the standard IS being set", it better be to something that significantly benefits PTSC shareholders too; assuming of course that our BOD doesn't continue to make illadvised financial decisions.