Unfortunate. This should not come as a shock to anyone. This itc judge really never wanted to even give us a fair shake. my view. If we messed up or not valuable information was never allowed. In an appeal this info should be allowed. I am afraid politics and the 52 lawyers had him. Wanted out. my view

Now. After reading the ndoc last night, the present judge seems totally different. He wants every article examined and explained and the opposition doesn't seem to have answers. They Just want to be evasive. How can you compare the two? I can't. Last night I understood the difference itc vs ndoc. politics out and the jury in. Not happy. But I am willing to wait for a jury trial of ordinary skills and not pressure of 52 lawyers. The jury will see right through this. And why isn't this pll jargon patented? my view