Is the MMP Patent Portfolio still a "patent Litigator's dream." I suppose Otteson should have asked Roger Cook that question. Did DL convince Otteson that these patents are bullet proof because of 17 re-exams. Did they emerge stronger or do they vaguely resemble the original patents? My only hope remains with the No District of CA in that there is enough evidence and/or gray areas to convince a jury of an infringement verdict once and for all. Of course Judge Grewal still has not ruled on HTC/Acer Motion for Summary Determination