Could well be, especially if they feel their exposure is less than $20M. I would think that's peanuts to them, and worth making the statement. If on the other hand their exposure is $50M, then regardless of their stated "principle", I would think their risk management would figure out a way to craft a settlement that would preserve their "principles" publicly (lol) and get out of the quagmire for $10M - $20M for example. We'll see.