They are better as of tonite lol...

On balance, the court finds that the amended claim language added during reexamination did not substantively amend the asserted ’336 claims’ scope. “Independent” in the disputed claims must be understood to be just that: without dependence of any kind. While HTC offers a more nuanced interpretation that focuses exclusively on frequency control, it cites no intrinsic – or for that matter extrinsic evidence – to support its position. Coupled with the references in the prosecution history indicating that the amendments really were for clarification purposes only, TPL’s argument is more persuasive.