If I am correct I am disappointed in that Leckrone once again decided to roll of the dice by putting the NDoC on the line when I think we all agreed that the NDoC was a different case then the ITC ruling.

That is the way I read it and my thoughts were/are the same as yours.. In fact I had a post started about this very issue but was called away and never finished it... If this is what happened, and it reads as if it is, why would Leckerone tie ACER's NDoC litigation to an ITC ruling that from all intents and purposes felt like a loss to many for some time prior to the ID?? Why would he risk losing a much more favorable ACER CC in NDoC (and potential big $$ willfull ruling) unless you got something substantial in return..??

They sued us.. at face value I don't like this either...