With respect to "reasonable royalties", did you see ease's post about the footnote to the ruling that allowed our expert to testify? On the last page, there is a foot note that references 2 cases that I interpreted to refer to the idea that while what was considered "reasonable royalties" at one time during early negotiations for a license, maybe less (perhaps much less - my added qualifier) than what should be considered "reasonable royalties" if coming as the result of a court ordered award. And, thus the "evidence" in this case, would be somewhat unique, since this is the FIRST time a fully litigated court awarded amount would be in play.

Do you intepret that similarly?