Nanobits is doing a great recap.

Tech speak can be made understandable, like Dr O is very good at doing, or it can be made to confuse, as the other side is working at doing.

The Jury (via their Qs) is focusing in on the issues, and asking good questions, which the Judge asks on their behalf, and it appears he also rephrases so as to even more narrowly focus on the elements at issue.

I think we got our arguments out and clearly articulated them. I also believe the likeability, credibility and veracity of Dr O is as good as we could possibly hope for.

There are several other issues I am concerned about, but prefer not to address them right now.

Catch you all on the other side. Good luck to us.