"But the documents for the signed agreements are real and and were overlooked by the Agora "dectectives"."

If you mean that the ongoing royalty language that you cited are "real and were overlooked", that's inaccurate.

As you know from reading the agreements your friend sent you, the Acer agreement clearly states in section 4.4 that this is a "flat royalty rate" license and was intentionally agreed as such by both parties to avoid the hassle and cost of monitoring and accounting for an ongoing rate agreement. The Amazon agreement is also clear by simply stating the license fee is to be paid in 2 installment, one due at signing, and one due, if an only if the ITC Initial Determination finds infringement by Amazon.

In either case, the 2 payments would be the only payments due from Amazon under the agreement except for interest that might accrue for late payments.

I'd reiterate Ron's request to you and extend it to all that if we want to post something and imply it as fact, at least have the particular issues that support your assertion cited and be sure they actually apply before posting. If not, clarify that it's an opinion, or ask it as a question. I thnk that would be most helpful.