Your words:

"filling the third seat would be problematic??? wow."

This strongly suggests that you believe it wouldn't be problematic. I asked you to please explain how it wouldn't be (based on my post). Nothing?

Your words:

"btw if their creditors get 1% instead of us, we would still get control as tpl would then have less than 50% and the creditors would want to see mmp maximized and we would still have 50% plus some portion of whatever the creditors get since we are listed as creditors....."

I suggested that perhaps you could offer a more thorough explanation of your thoughts. This after commenting on your words as provided above. You offer nothing.

Conversation ended, since it isn't one.

SGE