Our company needs new contracts in order to survive. DL is preoccupied with all of his own business and appears not to have time to carry through with his job of seeking new contracts. IMHO, we should be able to hire another firm--thoughts appreciated.

At least the committee seems to be investigating DL's actions. The statement that "time is of the essence" could not be more true as I can't see how long we can continue to fund PDS out of our own pocket. It would sure be upsetting if we did so and DL stayed in his current position. The "owner of greater than 50%" looks inviting, but 50% of nothing is still nothing.

All of the suits and court cases that we have had to endure over these years seem to have lasted forever. The shareholder's have certainly suffered as a consequence. I always thought that it was because "the other party" wanted it delayed--now I wonder if DL has not had a lot to with that. I hope not, but we have read some very disturbing things these last few days.

I hope that JO and the committee understand how this group of shareholder's have suffered -- by loss of capital AND time. How can such smart people be so cruel? The patents were/are good--these people could have acted honestly and made this company something to be proud of.

Does anyone think that we will hear about the ruling this week? GL, ads