You mean the one where you accused me of redacting parts of the Apple license court document that according to you I did for nefarious reasons to purposefully decieve investors because once again according to you the real truth was in the parts I had hidden..??

Where you stated that if I didn't come clean about the redacted parts it was gonna get real ugly...

I stated truthfully those redactions had nothing to do with Company A but you accused away.. It's obvious that the redactions that Banosser did were probably to hide info that would have revealed the truth. I posted on the forum what I had redacted: The redacted portions of the Hoge doc refer to: possible damage to licensing efforts if the facts enclosed within got out, especially the Exhibits... discussed Co B where the proportion allocated for MMP was reduced from 85% to 77.5% (which is probably Dresser after looking back)... and a separate lawsuit refering to DL's 'purchase' of ChipScale.. link

Here is the redacted version of the that court document I posted defending Brian's speculation of the Apple license debacle.. Here is the unredacted version for everyone to see and judge for themselves..

As to the % of the Apple license that was allocated to the MMP determining the $960K PTSC payment you can talk to Cliff and believe what he spins to you or you can believe what a Federal Court document states it as: the Declaration of Kenneth Prochnow under the penalty of perjury.. pg 2

(c) Patriot Scientific Corporation v. TPL, Santa Clara County Superior Court No. 1-10-CV169836, arising from TPL’s mis-allocation of a “mixed” MMP license to a major Silicon Valley firm, allowing TPL to appropriate for itself some 95% of the gross license proceeds without accounting to its MMP partners for their rightful share of a multimillion dollar license.

As I stated previously, I stand behind everything I posted