"Of course the ALJ did make his decision before our trial but that decision was that TPL (337-TA-841) satisified domest industry requirements which the full commission then overturned AFTER our trial"

Thanks for the timing clarification, I was mistaken.

"All that was to try to counter the "patent troll" argument that the tech giants and Obama have put out there which, I assume, we worry will poison a jury. Domestic industry is not a formal requirement for standing before the district court.."

Indeed, the threshold question, though historical, was the similar however; ie: proving Domestic use, and the trial court record supports that finding.