.” The Commission decision cites two Federal Circuit
decisions (InterDigital Communications. LLC., v ITC, 690 F.3d 1318 (Fed.Cir
. 2012) and
Microsoft Corp. v. ITC, 731 F.3d 1354 (Fed.Cir. 2013), as supporting the assertion that all ‘337
actions before the ITC require a domestic industry showing of “an article protected by the
[pertinent] patent.”
Neither TPL nor Alliacense made su
ch a showing, nor is capable of making such a
showing. Neither TPL nor Alliacense can defend the patents it has aggregated in actions before
the ITC"
What Justice?
"require a domestic industry showing of "an article protected by the patent."
Aren't the Infringers showing the article(s) protected by the patent ...
the infringers are selling the articles protected by the patent (on water)
the ingringers are drinking the water ... LOLOL
