is the elephant in the room with regards the 2012 Agreement.

The change from TPL to Alliacense is a distinction without a substantive difference .. other than the sanctioned siphoning going from 15% to 25%, from them being able to terminate the agreement or hold us hostage for "convenience", or for them to walk away with 9 years worth of Reverse engineering and Infringment Work Product that we paid for, or even our seeming inability to terminate the Agreement even for Cause; and on and on and on.

What is the motivation of a lawyer who would agree to these types of terms, especially when such a weak settlement results from an evidence heavy Fraud suit against their JV partner ?????????????