One should consider that the JURY demonstrated a HIGH degree of discernment in rendering their verdict of infringment..

It SHOULD therefore NOT come as a surprise that they were equally meticulous when it came to determining the appropriate amount of damages warranted for the specific items cited in this case..

It is my understanding that those items did NOT include the full panoply of products alleged to be infringing on the MMP Patents, rather they were the ONLY items/products cited in the charges.

IMO..

Have a happy..