In otherwords, PTSC is saying that should we not infact own all the patents, Falk Sr would have breached those Warrantees he gave us, but there is no recourse against Falk Sr because he is dead and NanoTronics has no assets.
Why wasn't this brought up in the Moore v PTSC ownership litigation? I do not remember seeing anything of this or anything about this in any of the filings/Pacers
I believe Falk Sr's heirs received a portion (or all) of the 10,000,000 shares that Falk Sr. got from the original transaction
I believe that would be the Falk Trust that Gloria oversaw and dispersed shares to heirs..
corrections welcomed