rather weigh in and finalize this issue because they (and I) forsee it will be revisited or used as leverage to enter the Court system again; and I'm all for that. I hope they intend to Rule. That's why my reaction to the denial is an excited "Oh man" . I do not want a Settlement.

I think Shareholder's should welcome a Ruling; one way or another. A ruling will either Stengthen us or Weaken us, but at least we will know far better where we stand with this stock as an investment; instead of as an almost dead Company with it's continued existence acting like an unaccountability Jobs Program and Cash Cow for the Insiders and providers who are draining the Treasury dry for their "service".

Ron wrote: "The denial may, although not necessarily, also show that, with the hearing date now so near, the Court may have essentially made up its mind and is ready to rule, or will be ready very shortly after oral argument. As I've said many times, it usually requires a federal appellate court several weeks or months to issue its ruling, but there are always exceptions. If I was one of the lawers in our case, this denial would be on my mind in that context."

Thanks as always, I agree, and this has been my hope ..