Yes, I think we're in agreement.

1. Zero difference in front of Grewal, other than to strengthen his claim construction within the NDCA in case a CAFC appeal were to be had again.

2. Appeal to the CAFC by an infringer is likely less palatable. There will be second thoughts by any infringers about even engaging in litigation because of the possibly strengthened Grewal ruling that is out there and the new and greater uncertainty in appealing to the CAFC.

3. Possibly quicker settlements or licensing deals because of 1 and 2. I think this one could be telling as to whether the decision made a difference.