Sorry that I was not more specific in my reference to Judge Grewel.

..." in this struggle is".

.Not meant to be applied to the entire UNIVERSE of Judges..

--------------------------------------------

Judge Gildea apparently did NOT understand that the patent decoupled the speed of the Central processing unit,,from the I/O speed.

Increasing the speed of the CPU required a faster method of FEEDING the CPU.

This was accomplished by incorporating a multi-fetch element., in the "ORIGINAL",Patent application..

(Which was SO NOVEL and different from all other attempts to accomplish what the Moore/FISH,Patent did. (MMP),,,....That the USPTO required them to separate the components into different patent applications..(resulting in seven parts being patented as stand alone patents.)..

Subsequent challenges to the validity were defeated, and the patents were approved by the USPTO..

Then the infringers went on the attack, with various arguments that confused and conflated terms and other tactics to avoid paying for USE of the patents..

They seem to be straining at the BIT, to go back to the, 'Virtual', roots of Patent Law.

Racking up those BILLABLE HOURS...

What-A-Crock..