I just have this feeling we are going to hear something by the end of the month, in our favor! It's just a feeling... I know the wording is everything but after listening to the proceedings again, I can't help but think about the female judges comment regarding the "attorney" who tried to say too much in the description. Can this panel see this as a mistake and find in favor of us? Can they wash this all down the drain for something so simple? Obviously the answer is yes to the latterĀ but there is still hope!
I woder who the $2 million third party licensee was?