I have been saying all along that PTSC could possibly connected to the Intelasys project and that the project could have something to do with the next ``killer chip`` or ``reconfigurable computing`` (on the fly computing). Do you all remember when Transmeta was being so secretive about the crusoe? It could be that is what is going on here. If so, then Intel has gone to great expense. They have pulled some of the computer giants together to work on this thing. They have set up new fab plants to produce it . Could it be that we are a part of the plan? It is evident that our stock is being accumulated by some huge player right now. I just wanted to point out some of the reasons that I think we could be part of an overall plan---and remember, this is separate from the infringement cases (which I think will bring us great rewards).

Basic reasons that I have stated before:

1. Intelasys was set up

2. Look at all of people on board (including Nick)

3. PTSC got Jim back

4. And the list goes on if you have read my posts

Now, add this to the overall mix------------------

AMD/Intel compatibility ( old, but valid) Pay particular attention to Belgard quotes

http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/hardware/0,39042972,39168433,00.htm

Intel/PTSC squabble--again, pay attention to Belgard quotes

http://news.com.com/2100-1006_3-5156771.html

Do you all remember a company by the name of Imsys (from the old days of Sun and Java) :)? Look who has just been appointed to their advisory board.

http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/imt/imt100.html

I know that taken individually, these things mean squat--If you start adding them together, there could sure be something there. Good luck, ads