The issue with any newspaper article is we don`t know the bias of the reader, who arranged the article (many ARE arranged), whether the Pohl`s quote is correct, whether it is properly taken in context in regard to royalties, etc. He may well have said exactly what he is quoted as saying, but in reference to what?

Too often I have seen cut-and-paste quotes taken from ``here`` in the conversation and moved over ``here`` to get the result I want.

As a writer and the director of a small independent publishing company, I see this all the time in manuscripts. DD shows egregious errors.

We simply do not know, and until we do for sure, rely on the PRs, and the answers you get at the SHM, but NOT on newspaper articles.

tps