Mosaic ImmunoEngineering is a nanotechnology-based immunotherapy company developing therapeutics and vaccines to positively impact the lives of patients and their families.

Free
Message: billwilke

billwilke

posted on Jun 21, 2008 06:12AM

I posted this 10 minutes after the post you referrenced. Or as soon as I realized that that wasn't mentioned in the original post.


"I'm sorry, this is from the USPTO."


It was an unfortunate mistake, nothing more. I think all the posts taken in their entirety show that.



Ok, the sequence of posts:

1

5809336 patent

Posted by: billwilke on June 20, 2008 10:18AM

A certificate has been issued 06/17/08.

That's as much as I know. I'm trying to get an answer on the 6598148. I'll post it as soon as I get it



2

Re: 5809336 patent Bilwilke I did not find that are you refereing

Posted by: Albie on June 20, 2008 10:26AM

In response to: 5809336 patent by billwilke

To the documents that were filed in the Eastern Texas?

Those were issued on the 17th.



3

Re: 5809336 patent Bilwilke I did not find that are you refereing

Posted by: billwilke on June 20, 2008 10:28AM

In response to: Re: 5809336 patent Bilwilke... by Albie

I'm sorry, this is from the USPTO.



4

Re: emtnester

Posted by: billwilke on June 20, 2008 11:07AM

In response to: Re: Are you kidding? The 3... by emtnester

All I know is I inquired of the progress on the '336 and '148 reexaminations. I talked to a guy that I talked to a while back.

He said "a cerificate was issued on the '336.

I asked if that meant the reexam on the 336 is done.

He replied "yes, a certificate has been mailed to the patent holder"

He looked up the '148 and said he saw nothing on it "somebody else is handling that, Joseph .... I can't pronounce his last name" he gave me the phone number, I called, got a recorded msg, left my number.

No call back yet, I'll call again this afternoon if I don't hear from him.

Now everyone knows as much as I do.



5

Re: emtnester

Posted by: billwilke on June 20, 2008 11:19AM

In response to: Re: emtnester by emtnester

You obviously know much more than most of us and a lot more than I do.

I hope I'm not creating unreasonable optimism, but I relayed it as I got it from this guy.

A cerificate was issued on 6-17-08 on the 90 008 319 (the control number for the 5809336)



6

Last call to the USPTO for me

Posted by: billwilke on June 20, 2008 11:48AM

Rechecked the information and the guy I spoke with came up with 3 DIFFERENT CN#s for the 5809336.

90008319 90008227 900088306

When I originally called him and asked about 5809336 he came up with the 90000319 and that was the certificate issued 6-17-08. Not for the '336 patent. Where that ever came from I have no idea.

I'm sorry for all this mix-up. Can't tell you how bad I feel to get everyone's hopes up.





Please note the time of these 2 posts:

1a

That other place has it wrong on the '336

Posted by: milestone on June 20, 2008 10:57AM



The 4 filings on 06-17-2008 relate to the filing of a court action in EDMarshall Division by PTSC/TPL.





2a

A cerificate was issued on 6-17-08 on the 90 008 319 (the control number for the

Posted by: milestone on June 20, 2008 11:28AM



Hmmmm


REEXAMINATION CONTROL NUMBER 90/008,319


PATENT NO 5292283





Based on posts 1, 2, and 3, I humbly suggest that this statement,



"I posted this 10 minutes after the post you referrenced. Or as soon as I realized that that wasn't mentioned in the original post"

is only partially correct.



If you saw the following posted,



A certificate has been issued 06/17/08.

That's as much as I know. I'm trying to get an answer on the 6598148. I'll post it as soon as I get it



as a Forum Leader, how would you have responded to ensure the integrity of the board and compliance with the rules? I'm sure you can see where I'm going with this, so I don't expect a reply.



With rights come responsibilities.





Be well



Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply