From that other place...
posted on
Jun 22, 2008 02:38AM
Posted by: nezahualcoyotl2012 on June 21, 2008 11:18PM
In response to: Re: Interesting Stuff Opty by billwilke
Is this true?
This is from Stocktrader on Investor's hub.
billwilke post on agoracom today is a little suspicious imo .Today on agoracom the post at 11.48 am he states. when i originally called him asked about the 336 he came up with the 9000319 and that was the certificate issued 6/17/08 not for the 336 patent where that came from i have know idea ..Then he states im sorry for the mix up cant tell you how bad i feel for getting everyones hopes up ...fair enough but his post on agoracom may 06 at 2.19 pm just a month and a half ago he did the same thing . he states on may 06 2.19 pm Very sorry for the confusion we certainaly dont need any more of that if you call in the future use the controll number and even gives the controll number to use even . he basicly did the same thing a month ago.It seems he had already known about the controll number back in may 06 2.19 pm ..and also he is president and client of agoracom .just a little fishy to me in my opinion .
Posted by: billwilke on May 06, 2008 01:41PM Got bounced around a bit, wound up with a woman who seemed to know less than I did (hard to believe). Asked why 5809536 was in file depository in Franconia when it's in re-exam. She said because it's "Not IFW" Huh? Asked her to explain..........long silence. Then she added it's been "dislocated" since 1998. Another Huh? Asked her to explain... long silence, then she transferred me to reexam. Dead phone, so I called direct spoke to "Manual" (sp?). He said the 5809536 is NOT being re-examined. And repeated the same thing after 2 or 3 more "are you sures". That's it. I don't know what to make of it. Posted by: billwilke on May 06, 2008 02:19PM Spoke to Manual again The 5809336 control number 90008474 has been combined with 90008306 and 90008237. I guess this is not new information. The 3 are being reviewed together. I tried to get a time span from him and he said he had no idea. So we have nothing, I didn't expect much when I started this thing, it's been my belief they'll be done when the're done and there's no way we can forecast when. Very sorry for the confusion, we certainly don't need any more of that. If you call in the future the control numbers mean more to them than the patent numbers.
Just got off the phone with the USPTO
Second call to USPTO
Posted by: billwilke on May 06, 2008 02:35PM
In response to: Second call to USPTO by billwilke
Look at this post and disregard the first one. She said the wrong number I gave her had no IFW which certainly makes sense.
The 336 is under review. It has been combined with 2 others, I don't have the patent numbers but the control numbers
90008306
90008237
and the control number for the 5809336 is 90008474.
Posted by: billwilke on May 07, 2008 07:55AM
In response to: Re: Oral arguments today, h... by Sabre68
"Just one more screw-up like that and I'll have to send you back to the dreaded Mailroom!"
I understand the mailroom is a nice place, nice friendly people and no tension like life at the top being a "President".