You call me on the omission of a question mark yet you post this....sentence? satement? question? lol

Because GW lied about WMD what about Iran who we know that they have nuclear technology?

You post:

I get it, because I don't agree with you I lack crediblity.

Actually, no. IMO, as I indicated in my last post, your insistence on applying blanket absolutes like "GW totally sucked, and still does" REDUCES your credibility. This is different that "you lack credibility". You can go to www.dictionary.com if your are unfamiliar with these English words. lol