Mosaic ImmunoEngineering is a nanotechnology-based immunotherapy company developing therapeutics and vaccines to positively impact the lives of patients and their families.

Free
Message: Re: Health care travesty ---$800,000 in donations from health industry

You're right

Its a travesty

In todays edition of Livingston Press & Argus, Republican Representative Mike Rogers (R-Brighton) goes on the attack against the health care legislation currently being considered by Congress. According to Rogers:
"We are going to punish the 85 percent of Americans who have private health insurance so that we can try and fix this problem of the 15 percent who don't," he said. "It makes no sense to me that we would abandon American ingenuity."
Given Rogers' ties to the health care industry, his stance to protect the health insurance companies at the expense of the un- and under-insured citizens of the U.S.A. is no surprise.
Eclectablog :: Rep. Mike Rogers: Healthcare Reform Will Punish the Already-Insured
According to OpenSecrets.org, Mike Rogers has received over $800,000 from health-oriented sources since 2006. Perhaps this explains, at least in part, his vociferous defense of private health insurance. What it doesn't do is explain his bizarre explanation for his stance. To wit:
Rogers...found several issues with the existing plan. For starters, he noted, according to Democrats, 45.8 million (roughly 15 percent) of Americans do not have health insurance.

However, he added that 9 million people in that group make more than $75,000 and do not purchase insurance, while another 11 million are people eligible for a government program but choose not to enroll.

"We are going to punish the 85 percent of Americans who have private health insurance so that we can try and fix this problem of the 15 percent who don't," he said. "It makes no sense to me that we would abandon American ingenuity."
Let's parse that a bit, shall we? According to Rogers, 20 million people in this country are uninsured by choice. 9 million, he says, can afford it but choose not to buy it anyway. As FactCheck.org points out, this number is quite inflated. Annual health care insurance costs can be as high as $16,000 in some places plus many folks are turned down for insurance due to pre-existing conditions and those that do qualify are often quoted higher rates.

Of the 11 million he cites that supposedly qualify for federal assistance but don't avail themselves of it, over half are children under the age of 18. There are many reasons why people don't seek federal help. Some of them may simply be unaware the programs exist while others fear the shame they would experience having to "be on the public dole". Why children don't go down to the government offices to apply on their own behalf is left to the reader as a take-home exercise.

At any rate, those (less than) 20 million "uninsured-by-choice" people are not 15% of the uninsured so his statement that we're punishing the other 85% on their behalf is, well, absurd.

Rogers also thinks it's unfair to tax the wealthy.

"This is just for health care," Rogers said. "They've gone after them for other things. When it's all said and done, that income level will spend more than half of its income on the federal, state (and) local government. When you start taking that much money from anybody, it becomes an issue of fairness and growth."
What Rogers doesn't say is that the level of taxation of the über-wealthy under the proposed plan would still be less than that during the Reagan years. In the meantime, improving our health care insurance system and lowering costs helps everyone, including wealthy business owners who now compete on a slightly more level playing field in the global market against countries with single-payer systems. All of that money they don't spend on health care costs? It goes right to the bottom line.

However, Rogers' real motivations can be found in the following quote:

Moreover, Rogers said that under the Democrats' plan, businesses would actually save more money by kicking employees off their private insurance plans and onto a government-run plan.

"They've created this perverse incentive for people to get off their private plans and to get on the government plan," he said. "They've made no provision to handle that many people."
That's the key to the whole thing isn't it? He's worried people will actually like the government-run insurance because it will be lower costs (no profit motive, right?) and because you can't be kicked off due to a pre-existing condition. What happens when people begin to move to the public option? Rogers benefactors see their profits go down. And this, as they say, simply can not stand!

So what's Rogers' answer?

Rogers...said the keys are to expand federal support for state high-risk pools, so the larger the pool, the less the premiums. Small businesses should also be allowed to band together to purchase insurance, which he noted would lower insurance costs and make coverage available to more people.

"All of those things are part of a complicated way of lowering costs and bettering access to better quality without turning over your doctor-patient relationship to the federal government," Rogers said.

Rogers also wants to expand and protect health savings accounts, noting the plans are, on average, 20 percent cheaper for employers than traditional insurance plans, while giving patients more control and choices.
Rogers plan doesn't help the uninsured that don't belong to one of these so-called "high-risk pools" and there's certainly no guarantee that privately insuring "high-risk" Americans will mean their rates will be lower than would be the case with a public insurance program. The plan to "expand and protect health savings accounts" is ludicrous. Those plans exist now and expanding them will have an infinitesimal effect on health care costs.

But it's Rogers' concern about the federal government being involved with the doctor-patient relationship that is most ridiculous. He would, apparently, prefer that bureaucrats from for-profit insurance companies be the only ones allowed to get between the doctor and patient. And when profits are on the line, I think we all know who gets "punished".

There is some good news, however:
[Rogers] said he plans on proposing all the aforementioned items as amendments to the health-care reform plan currently before Congress, but he acknowledges they will likely be shot down during committee hearings.
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply