Wait a minute. When candidate Obamao was running against Bush last year, I thought he promised "Change" to Washington.
Since you say that (implementing tort reform) is a "phoney [sic] argument" (using the term 'moot' would be more indicative of the point I think you were trying to get across), I guess that means you really don't expect much"Change" from Chairman Obamao, now do you?
So what's stopping your politbureau from implementing 'tort reform' now?
Would that not be REAL "Change"?
I guess we all know that the answer to THAT second question is moot, don't we?