I haven't seen any explanations from those folks who gave a thumbs-up to the posted Rolling Stone article which described them as "idiots"; I'm guessing it's because they're too embarrassed to say that they voted for the headline (or for the poster... or against the responder) without bothering to read the content. So it goes here.

I read that article in it's entirety. For what it's worth, I will not respond to your questions directly becuase until recently you have been the most civil and articulate of the posters here on this board that I disagree with when it comes to OT topics. I can live with you pointing out my spelling errors, (as I do make them). But I've already written off one poster here who has personally called me a liar. In fact it's his M.O. to pretty much call everyone on this board that doesn't agree with him a liar; but he made it personal with me. I see that you've gotten to the point where you are calling others on this board a liar now. In the name of keeping the lines of conversation open on this this forum, I will not respond to those questions directly so that you don't have to call me a liar also. Because as soon as you start questioning my integrity and do that; well then, I'll be looking forward to us hopefully getting together some day face to face also; just like I currently am to that other unnamed poster. Realistically, it probably won't happen; but non the less, I would like to be able to agree to disagree and keep things civil than go down that road.

- 67GTO