Hurry up!!

According to sources
who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama
by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.

Ever since Obama
assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional
issues. Critics have complained that much if not all of Obama's major initiatives
run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government.

Obama certainly
did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State
of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling
that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political
ads during the time of an election. The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well
with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head
and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning
the Court's ruling.

As it has turned
out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the
judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the
court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face
of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over
200 years. Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one
enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh. And it is no accident that
the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he
has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'

Apparently, the
Court has had enough. The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of
course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been
screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important
issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long
overdue.

First, there is
ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government
from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing
as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired
claim. The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such
things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not
to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the ObamaCare
world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'

Second, sources
state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies
in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office
of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information
involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while
Obama was a high school student in Hawaii. And that is only the tip of the iceberg.

Third, several cases
involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism
could potentially land many Administration officials, if not the President himself,
in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics,
nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration,
not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like
choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.

In addition, the
Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ
to sue the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders
to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law
on illegal aliens.

And finally, the
biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall
is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its
refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. The group is caught on tape committing
felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the
polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the
deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved
in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on
tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.

This one is a biggie
that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have
the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.