HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: AGORACOM....Re: 43-101 on SEDAR, please post it
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Icon question 43-101 on SEDAR, please post it
3
DonnyParks
Aug 18, 2008 10:50AM
Icon agoracom Re: 43-101 on SEDAR, please post it
3
AGORACOM
Aug 18, 2008 12:03PM
AGORACOM....Re: 43-101 on SEDAR, please post it
2
jacki79
Aug 18, 2008 03:14PM
Re: AGORACOM....Re: 43-101 on SEDAR, please post it
3
QQ_Girl
Aug 18, 2008 03:48PM
Why has agoracom ignored NOT's significant 43-101 PR ?
6
shakey
Aug 18, 2008 04:04PM
Re: Why has agoracom ignored NOT's significant 43-101 PR ?
14
hoov
Aug 18, 2008 04:13PM

Hi QQ

Very thoughtful of you. I've now tried your link 3 times, and

the AGORACOM links at least 3 times.....to no avail.

It must be my computer illiteracy!

It's o.k. I've picked up portions of it ,and it's too technical

anyway, so I will wait for the brilliant interpretations of the

Smart Geos on this Board!

We're looking good ...and someday soon the world will realize it!

Now that the 43 -101 is filed, I just hope Richard and Team will

promote it effectively! Waiting patiently along with others.


Thanks for your fine contributions, QQ.

Cheers,

jacki79




3 Recommendations
Re: AGORACOM....Re: 43-101 on SEDAR, please post it
2
archie277
Aug 18, 2008 04:58PM
Re: Why has agoracom ignored NOT's significant 43-101 PR ?
20
shakey
Aug 18, 2008 04:59PM
Ceo verified Re: Why has agoracom ignored NOT's significant 43-101 PR ?
6
glorieux
Aug 18, 2008 05:04PM
Re: AGORACOM....Re: 43-101 - Jacki79
1
Helium
Aug 19, 2008 01:06AM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply