HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: AGORACOM....Re: 43-101 on SEDAR, please post it
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Icon question 43-101 on SEDAR, please post it
3
DonnyParks
Aug 18, 2008 10:50AM
Icon agoracom Re: 43-101 on SEDAR, please post it
3
AGORACOM
Aug 18, 2008 12:03PM
AGORACOM....Re: 43-101 on SEDAR, please post it
2
jacki79
Aug 18, 2008 03:14PM
Re: AGORACOM....Re: 43-101 on SEDAR, please post it
3
QQ_Girl
Aug 18, 2008 03:48PM
Why has agoracom ignored NOT's significant 43-101 PR ?
6
shakey
Aug 18, 2008 04:04PM
Re: Why has agoracom ignored NOT's significant 43-101 PR ?
14
hoov
Aug 18, 2008 04:13PM
Re: AGORACOM....Re: 43-101 on SEDAR, please post it
3
jacki79
Aug 18, 2008 04:25PM

There has been much discussion about the expected appearance of the 43-101 today. The talk has been about the effect of the NR on the SP. My in-experience will show through here...but, does the filing of the 43-101 with SEDAR constitute a NR/PR? When it was first announced that the 43-101 came out it was very difficult to find and there was very little information!

Normally, a NR would be a general broadcast but that diddn't happen this time...even Agoracom has yet to put the NR report out officially. So, the question is whether or not a NR has been issued officially?



Comment please....



A277

2 Recommendations
Re: Why has agoracom ignored NOT's significant 43-101 PR ?
20
shakey
Aug 18, 2008 04:59PM
Ceo verified Re: Why has agoracom ignored NOT's significant 43-101 PR ?
6
glorieux
Aug 18, 2008 05:04PM
Re: AGORACOM....Re: 43-101 - Jacki79
1
Helium
Aug 19, 2008 01:06AM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply