HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Windfall-More Thoughts-Polylabel
8
Oct 08, 2008 12:17PM
3
Oct 08, 2008 12:27PM
71
Oct 08, 2008 12:28PM
10
Oct 08, 2008 12:53PM

Oct 08, 2008 12:53PM

Oct 08, 2008 01:08PM

Thanks for your comments. My thoughts go back to when many potential investors were trying to evaluate mining companies for their inherent value. Time and time again, their major complaint was that the multitude of different assets/properties of a company, meaning range of commodities being sought/owned, made it almost impossible to figure out just what these companies were. Hence, companies attempted to rearrange/realign/ focus their property portfolios so that they could be considered a "pure Au or Cu or Ni play" and more easily understood. This attempt at "consolidation" has proven beneficial to the companies from an investor point of view.

geoprof

5
Oct 08, 2008 01:48PM
5
Oct 08, 2008 02:11PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply