HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Post
25
Sep 30, 2009 02:18PM
2
Sep 30, 2009 02:28PM
7
Sep 30, 2009 02:42PM
6
Sep 30, 2009 02:55PM

Re: Post

in response to by
posted on Sep 30, 2009 03:11PM

Stormin, no I was not saying someone should never question decisions based upon an assessment of management as long as that assessment is based on some facts and reality backed up by ones own due diligence. It would not be based upon the emotional outburst of a frustrated individual.

As for Joe at the party, I would get at least 2 or 3 references and check them out BEFORE making a decision. One bad experience by some dude at a party that could be drunk isn't going to make a decision for me.

I was giving these people the benefit of the doubt and holding back on calling them bashers, maybe I'm being naive but was only trying to be calm and fair to all.

This baord should be used for what it is (has been) known for as long as I have been around, a source of good information and leads in order to perform my own due diligence. Long time posters like Glorieux, Donny, Hoov and QQ to name a few add value, provide good insight and are VERY much appreciated (heck I think I might have even proposed to QQ Girl last year). Posters that start a post with "Ripped Off" and continue with the emotional negativity add squat.

Jeeper

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply