Re: We waited a long time for just 5 holes Kitco values, Edgy

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Boatboy

Rank: President [?]

Points: 7484 [?]

Votes: 238 Score: 3.5 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: We waited a long time for just 5 holes Kitco values, Edgy

in response to

Re: We waited a long time for just 5 holes Kitco values

Edgy

posted on Jun 03, 2010 10:38AM

The hole I calculated is in the new area (not in fill). My comment relates to the situation say for example where in the 43-101 calculation the models suggest say 100 M at 3% and when you infill you actually find 75 M at 2%.... that is what costs you volume my friend. Don't mix apples and oranges. In fill drilling only increases volumes if the grade/widths are increased over the assumed model values.

4 Recommendations

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply