posted on
Oct 06, 2013 12:18PM
In my dissuasion with mgt at agm it was made very clear that in trying to monetize poet that they would b in the "bob weave" mode. I took this to mean they would b governed by events as to the sequence of steps they would b taking. Therefore, they will not b tied to milestone dates as much as by what suitors were requesting to further monetization goals! I.e. 100 requirement. Thus, I find all this theorizing about what is going on to b useless. We have to have faith that mgt is taking steps that in their view as to what needs to be done to monetize. Fairchild, one point I would like cleared up if possible based on your conversation with chu.. As I understood based on your conversation with chu our monetization group was in silicone valley working on items dealing with third quarter sec reporting requirements. First, question is why would they b dealing with these matters which should be done by other employees of poet such as fully paid financial person rather than wasting time on these mundane chores. As u, I feel milestone 7 has been achieved by dr Taylor at the Connecticut lab. As I understand the hold up is with bae verifying. The other question I have Fairchild is your reference to chu's statement as to many issues dealing with not confirming 7 has been completed. It seems the only issue is whether bae has completed the tests to authenticate that 7 has been completed. What other issues r there relating to not report on 7???