Thanks for those thoughts FJ which I feel make good sense.

It has been bothering me that the Managment's Strategy has to be pieced together by us shareholders piecemeal form NR Surely it is time for the Company to stop all the guesswork and come out with its plans in plain and simple terms that I/we as laymen can understand. A much more finite and crafted confident document is required as CP, rather the 'this is where we want to be' style of the present CP. It time for this is where we are and isn't it good.

Of course its part of the fun of this board to double guess and read between the lines of each and every bit of news released. But now that the substantial peices are in places and I fully believe that there is now a principle PDA on board, it is time to give us sharehoders the full strory. In particular because, I, for one ,am uncomfortable that PP participants are at an advantage over us little guys as regards the full story. Is it not our right to know more.

The GSF will be key to finding customers and co participants in the next stage of POET's development . Clearly the PR strategy is working nicely in the buildup, ducks in line et al, but I suspect we are being denied certain fundemental rights as sharehoders to the full story and its time to spiil the beans Mr Coppetti and keeping powder dry for the buildup to GSF has denied shareholders facts we should not have to guess. I am weary of the smoke and mirrors approach Mr Chu.

One particular requirement for me is a full explanation of the pipeline of products envisaged now that the fundementals are there. I want to be awed by the power of POET.