Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: Death of Moore's Law

Champagnepwder , welcome aboard and great post. I'm going to copy it here if you don't mind

This is what the death of Moore’s law looks like: EUV rollout slowed, 450mm wafers halted, and an uncertain path beyond 14nm

Share This Article

There have been a number of events over the past few weeks that collectively point to serious problems ahead for the semiconductor market and all the players in that space. While some companies will be impacted more than others, the news isn’t great for anyone. The entire economic structure that was supposed to support both Intel and the major foundries as they moved to next-generation manufacturing technologies, such as 450mm wafers, extreme ultraviolet lithography, and 20nm CMOS, is on the verge of coming apart.

450mm wafers and EUV

18 months ago, TSMC, Intel, and Samsung made headlines when they all poured moneyinto ASML’s efforts to develop 450mm wafers. These were major announcements at the time and they signaled that all of the major logic manufacturers were on the same page when it came to 450mm wafer development. Then, in December, came news that ASML had hit “pause” on this project. Intel’s 450mm installation at Fab D1X is reportedly on hold, as is the company’s Fab 42 in Arizona.

The CEO of Applied Materials, Gary Dickerson, has stated that the 450mm wafer timeline “has definitely been pushed out from a timing standpoint.” That’s incredibly important, because the economics of 450mm wafers were tied directly to the economics of another struggling technology — EUV (extreme ultraviolet lithography). EUV is the follow-up to 193nm lithography that’s used for etching wafers, but it’s a technology that’s spent over a decade mired in technological problems and major ramp-up concerns.

TSMC’s talk on EUV at SPIE wasn’t kind – Image courtesy of EETimes

One of the single greatest problems is source power. To put this simply — no one, including ASML, has yet demonstrated an EUV tool capable of reaching anything like the necessary power concentrations or of sustaining production volumes. Instead, we’re stuck at the red dot shown above. The enormous costs of shifting to EUV and 450mm wafers were meant to be partly offset by making the jump at the same time.

That might not make sense at first, but remember — EUV was expected to reducelithography costs by allowing manufacturers to move away from expensive double patterning. The high cost of 450mm wafers and equipment would be offset by superior economies of scale from the larger wafer sizes. 450mm also offered less loss at the edge and better throughput in terms of wafers per hour.

EUV was expected to bring lithography costs under control

But if EUV doesn’t debut as a 450mm-only feature, then one of the major reasons to update goes down the tubes — and the more time goes by, the harder it gets for EUV to catch up. Without good EUV delivery, 450mm wafers may never make much sense. Samsung isreportedly balking on taking delivery — it’s not willing to risk losing market share to other memory manufacturers if a 450mm installation drive means less 300mm production.

The death of Moore’s law

At the SPIE Advanced Lithography conference at the end of February, a group of lithography engineers — men and women who have spent their careers pushing the boundaries of Moore’s law — toasted its death. This is the economic reality we predicted 15 months ago — flat scaling at 20nm compared to 28nm, and only marginal improvements predicted thereafter.

The video is meant to be funny, but the point isn’t being argued any more. Moore’s law is no longer expected to deliver improved transistor cost scaling at or below the 20nm node. It’s important to understand how that plays into concerns about EUV and 450mm wafers put together. For decades, it’s been a given that GPU and CPU transistor counts would increase every generation and that this would be economical because increased density allowed for a cheaper cost per square millimeter and more chips per die.

If per transistor costs rise, suddenly higher transistor counts become a liability. It’s still possible to pack more transistors per square millimeter, but that mindset becomes a financial liability — every increase in density increases costs instead of reducing them.

This is where 450mm wafers and EUV were supposed to come in. EUV relieves the need for double patterning and the tremendous additional costs that entails. 450mm wafers offer manufacturers far more area to work with, increasing fab productivity and boosting economics by allowing for much greater efficiencies of production. Improve these factors, and the higher per-transistor costs can be carried for a few more generations.

Instead, TSMC was sharply critical of ASML’s progress on EUV at the SPIE conference, and plans for 450mm wafers may have been delayed another nine years. In this industry, a 2023 roadmap for deployment is a polite way of saying “never,” though ASML itself has been quick to characterize these developments as nothing but a pause [Dutch].

Next page: So… er… what now?

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply