Re: Death of Moore's Law
in response to
by
Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications
Message: Death of Moore's Law
Stevey, you're making me do this arn't you and you started it.
This is my post to Aves
"And Aves you know that Intel is the only company i know for that POET had some direct connections with when they came right out and chalanged Intels statement on Moore's law, pretty well shutting them up. Their might have been more communication with Intel at that time or just after that has been kept secret. It was back about maybe 7 or 8 months ago. I'll see if I can find it but it struck me as being strange that POET went face to face, toe to toe if you will, with some of the top scientists (Intel people) and lectured them on what was right and what was wrong,Moores Law. At least that was the way I percieved it at the time."
That was the way i percieved it, that was the way i remembered it.
Here's what I'm talking about and i thought that that was pretty brave and confident of Copetti to make that statement. What's so GD hard for you to understand about that.
POET Response to: “Intel statement that Moore’s Law is not dead based on the fact that Intel will be shipping 14nm Broadwell Systems by the end of 2013 providing a 30 per cent improvement in power consumption over today’s comparable 22nm “Haswell” chips”
“This announcement adds little to what is already known since over two years ago (5/5/11) Intel had released a technology roadmap showing a process P1272 at a lithography of 14nm reaching 1st production in 2013. In the same roadmap a subsequent process P1274 at a lithography of 10nm is projected to reach 1st production in 2015. Realistically, Moore’s law is not quite dead, but it is on life support. Intel scientists have no plan beyond 10nm or possibly 7nm depending on which one you talk to. Similar conclusions has been reported recently by DARPA’s MTO director who makes the very realistic argument that making a transition to 10nm or less may well be determined by the business case, i.e. the rapidly increasing cost of production will not be recovered with sufficient margin. So it is clear that a major turning point in technological advancement is rapidly approaching. POET believes this turning point is towards integrated optical and quantum effects. Therefore Intel’s next generation technology should include the integration of optical technology and in particular the integration of optical gain. Thus far Si photonics has shown itself to be incapable of this and so POET believes this is the “once in a generation” opportunity for a re-baseline from Si to GaAs as a mainstream technology.”
-Peter Copetti, Executive Director & Chairman, Special Strategic Committee
This is what you just said
"you incapable of backing up the bullshit that you posted "Poet went toe to toe with IBM and won" or are you just ignorning that now because attempting to attack me instead of back up something you just posted that is wildy untrue is easier in your eyes."
Where do you see this in my post? (above) "Poet went toe to toe with IBM". Not only is it a GD lie You were even stupid enough to put quotation marks around that lie. You told me to defend my statement there it is.
Like I said you started this and I'll end it. You just wanted to put me down like always. People have said plenty of things on this board that could be questioned. Funny you picked me? I was making a good point. Obviously you didn't do any research to find out if it was true what I was trying to say. Hell, you were even to stupid to get the quote right.
Now I wasted enough time on your bullying garbage. I will speak to you no more.
POET the game changer, POET the disruptive technology POET the $70 stock.
Now my last 3 words to you Go """""""" yourself
9 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply