"If we see less then a 10billion dollar assesment from Pelagrino 2.0 I will be very suprised"

Please backup your statement to justify a 10 fold increase in value from the previous valuation that Pellegrino did in 2011. People are throwing around all kinds of silly numbers around here again today without requiring to back them up. If you are going to use them in multiple posts than back it up.

You honestly believe Pellegrino messed up that bad in 2011 (where tablets and smart phone markets were already booming) that it would change that much? They are a professional reputable company that will surely take a conservative approach to their valuation numbers and it wouldn't look good on them if they missed so much on their first valuation that it changed by 10x. I don't see it happening, though I would like to be proven wrong.

I too want to see a $10 billion valuation, heck a $20 billion would be even better but expecting that from Pellegrino and pushing that on this board will just set people up for disappointment in the end. I would like to avoid that here, along with the $70/share price talk as it discredits this board and buries the good DD posted here. Besides whatever Pellegrino comes out with now, and ultimately what POET is able to achieve in the long term will likely be very different (depending on whether they choose to license this for the long term). I want the same results, but just trying to keep it real - because as you should know, shareholders somehow always end up getting the short end of the stick - but if the stick is really big, thats still not a bad thing.