Well, when I said that 'if POET can do what it says it can do', I did not mean that someone at POET *literally* said this in an interview with the magazine. What I actually meant was that if the technology was sound then it will add more years of life to the potentiality of Moore's Law. But I can see, ScaryRacoon, how you may have misunderstood this and will be more careful with my wording.

So, my thoughts on this article were that there was no interview given and that it was just material lifted from either the website or other articles, so, again, I feel that any 'mixed messages' that you're getting from this article are in no way the fault of POET, but are the fault of the researcher and the magazine.